• Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership and Governance
    • Our Members and Partners
    • Communities
    • History
    • Klaus Schwab
    • Media
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • World Economic Forum USA
    • Privacy and Terms of Use
  • EN ES FR 日本語 中文
  • Login to TopLink

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Notice.

I accept
    Hamburger
  • World Economic Forum Logo
  • Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
  • TopLink
  • Search Cancel

Report Home

<Previous Next>
  • 1. Preface
  • 2. Introduction to the Mainstreaming Impact Investing Initiative
  • 3. More than an Idea: Creating the Case for Impact Investing
    • 3.1 Enhancing Financial Returns by Targeting Social Impact
    • 3.2 Making Impact Investing an Institutional Priority for Achieving Superior Investment Performance
    • 3.3 Evaluating Past “Impactful” Investments to Create a Future Impact Investing Strategy
    • 3.4 The Current Limits and Potential Role of Institutional Investment Culture and Fiduciary Responsibility
  • 4. Building a Strategy: Integrating Impact Investing in the Mainstream Investor’s Portfolio
    • 4.1 A Portfolio Approach to Impact Investment: A Framework for Balancing Impact, Return and Risk
    • 4.2 Leveraging Expertise across Asset Classes for an Institutional Impact Investment Mandate
    • 4.3 Incorporating Impact Criteria in Portfolio Construction: From Policy to Implementation
    • 4.4 How to Evaluate Impact Investing Fund Managers
    • 4.5 Best Practices of High-Performing Impact Investing Fund Managers
    • 4.6 Achieving Portfolio Diversification and Double Bottom Line through Investing in Underserved Markets
    • 4.7 Impact Investing through Advisers and Managers who Understand Institutional Client Needs
  • 5. Innovations for Unlocking Mainstream Capital
    • 5.1 Social Stock Exchanges: Democratizing Impact Investing
    • 5.2 Commingling Funds: Scaling Impact while Protecting the Interests of Diverse Capital Providers
    • 5.3 The Social Impact Bond Market: Three Scenarios for the Future
  • 6. Road Map: Next Steps for Mainstreaming Impact Investing
  • 7. Acknowledgements and About the Authors
Impact Investing – From Ideas to Practice, Pilots to Strategy Home Previous Next
  • Report Home
  • 1. Preface
  • 2. Introduction to the Mainstreaming Impact Investing Initiative
  • 3. More than an Idea: Creating the Case for Impact Investing
    • 3.1 Enhancing Financial Returns by Targeting Social Impact
    • 3.2 Making Impact Investing an Institutional Priority for Achieving Superior Investment Performance
    • 3.3 Evaluating Past “Impactful” Investments to Create a Future Impact Investing Strategy
    • 3.4 The Current Limits and Potential Role of Institutional Investment Culture and Fiduciary Responsibility
  • 4. Building a Strategy: Integrating Impact Investing in the Mainstream Investor’s Portfolio
    • 4.1 A Portfolio Approach to Impact Investment: A Framework for Balancing Impact, Return and Risk
    • 4.2 Leveraging Expertise across Asset Classes for an Institutional Impact Investment Mandate
    • 4.3 Incorporating Impact Criteria in Portfolio Construction: From Policy to Implementation
    • 4.4 How to Evaluate Impact Investing Fund Managers
    • 4.5 Best Practices of High-Performing Impact Investing Fund Managers
    • 4.6 Achieving Portfolio Diversification and Double Bottom Line through Investing in Underserved Markets
    • 4.7 Impact Investing through Advisers and Managers who Understand Institutional Client Needs
  • 5. Innovations for Unlocking Mainstream Capital
    • 5.1 Social Stock Exchanges: Democratizing Impact Investing
    • 5.2 Commingling Funds: Scaling Impact while Protecting the Interests of Diverse Capital Providers
    • 5.3 The Social Impact Bond Market: Three Scenarios for the Future
  • 6. Road Map: Next Steps for Mainstreaming Impact Investing
  • 7. Acknowledgements and About the Authors

2. Introduction to the Mainstreaming Impact Investing Initiative

Share

Nearly two years ago, at its Annual Meeting in Davos in January 2012, the World Economic Forum convened a discussion among mainstream investors and social entrepreneurs on how to harness the hype of Impact Investing. While the list of reasons why impact investing would remain niche seemed overwhelming, bringing it into the mainstream was too important an opportunity not to pursue.

With this in mind, the Forum launched the Mainstreaming Impact Investing Initiative. The first milestone – From the Margins to the Mainstream: Assessment of the Impact Investment Sector and Opportunities to Engage Mainstream Investors– was released in September 2013 and provided an overview of the sector, identified challenges constraining the flow of capital, and laid the groundwork for mainstream investors to begin a meaningful discussion on impact investment. Most of the constraints identified fit into one of four broad, overarching challenges: an early-stage ecosystem; small average deal size; the fit within an asset allocation framework; and double bottom line.

From Ideas to Practice, Pilots to Strategy is the second publication in the Forum’s Mainstreaming Impact Investing Initiative. The report takes a deeper look at why and how asset owners began to include impact investing in their portfolios and continue to do so today, and how they overcame operational and cultural constraints affecting capital flow. Given that impact investing expertise is spread among dozens if not hundreds of practitioners and academics, the report is a curation of some –but certainly not all –of those leading voices. The 15 articles are meant to provide investors, intermediaries and policy-makers with actionable insights on how to incorporate impact investing into their work. 

Target Audience for Ideas to Practice, Pilots to Strategy 

This publication’s target audience includes three key groups: (1) investors looking to start impact investing; 2) active impact investors looking to expand impact investing from a limited part of their work to a full-fledged strategy; and (3) intermediaries, policy-makers and development finance institutions whose support is vital for the sector’s growth. Since large investors often have a proportionally large influence on a sector, a key focus is on highlighting best practices or frameworks from large asset owners and asset managers.

Motivation and Scope of Ideas to Practice, Pilots to Strategy

The report’s goals are to show how mainstream investors and intermediaries have overcome the challenges in the impact investment sector, and to democratize the insights and expertise for anyone and everyone interested in the field. Divided into four main sections, the report contains lessons learned from practitioner’s experience, and showcases best practices, organizational structures and innovative instruments that asset owners, asset managers, financial institutions and impact investors have successfully implemented.

The strategic case for impact investing from the mainstream investor’s perspective is the focus of “More than an Idea: Creating the Case for Impact Investing”. This section includes the following key messages:

  • Reflecting environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards in the investment process, across asset classes and alongside traditional financial metrics and competent risk management practices, can generate superior risk-adjusted, long-term investment returns. Moreover, inadequate ESG capability can lead to poor financial performance.
  • Institutional investors can shape markets and encourage managers to design products with social impact. Recent data indicates that many institutional investors look to incorporate ESG standards into their investment decision-making. However, so that impact investment strategy becomes an institutional priority, decisions must come from top leadership. Institutions that have a commitment from top leadership for impact investing (or a similar mission) find it easier to implement the strategy as well as collaborate for shared successes.
  • Reviewing past successes, those intended or not, can help investors evaluate potential strategy within their institutions. Large investors can conduct a rigorous review and retroactively tag their investments as “impactful” (i.e. those with a measurable social and financial return, but without clear intent). By sharing this knowledge, such investors help to set a reassuring climate for future impact investment strategy that would include explicit intention to generate measurable social and financial returns.
  • Traditional investors are seeing the benefits of diversifying portfolios by working with socially minded investment managers who generate reasonable returns that are somewhat uncorrelated.
  • Conventional interpretations of fiduciary duty can lead to herding, which while providing safety of numbers, can produce investment decisions that are not in investors’ long-term interests. For impact investing to engage pension funds, there must be a clear account of how impact investing is congruent with fiduciary duty, and active engagement with asset owners on why impact investments may require funds to reassess their own attitudes towards what constitutes “conventional” investment. 

The section on “Building a Strategy” provides examples of organizational structures, processes and strategies employed by large asset owners and asset managers to implement impact investing, while generating risk-adjusted financial returns and meeting the fiduciary responsibilities of institutional investors. Depending on the organizational structure, the frameworks may include impact investing as an investment approach across various asset classes; or, focusing and developing expertise in a particular sector. This section’s key messages include the following:

  • Impact Investing can be done within a large institution through a variety of operational approaches: a stand-alone team, a hub-and-spoke structure, an outsourced adviser or an institution-wide commitment and strategy. Whatever the approach, the impact investment thesis and criteria for selecting and evaluating impact should be clear from the outset. In addition to diversifying across asset classes, impact investors can increasingly diversify across impact sectors as markets deepen
  • Investors need to ensure that impact investing is well-integrated into an organization’s decision-making processes and has buy-in from major internal stakeholders. If impact investing has received support from top leadership, integration of it throughout the organization is a matter of communication and coordination. In other circumstances, it is up to the teams to open communication channels laterally and collaborate across teams for shared objectives such as diversified portfolios and reduced costs of entering new markets. Impact investors can diversify not only across asset classes, but also and increasingly across impact sectors, as markets deepen and the choice of investment opportunities grows.
  • Given impact investing is a nascent sector, focusing due diligence on fund managers’ track records may hold the industry back. Investors should rather seek to understand the factors determining a fund manager’s decision-making process. 
  • Partnership is critical for success. Successful impact investing fund managers share four qualities: partnering effectively with the public sector, using catalytic capital, providing “multilingual” (i.e. cross-sector) leadership, and placing financial and social objectives on equal standing. Moreover, treating investors (LPs) as partners from the outset on governance structures, financial and development goals, as well as including impact objectives early in the investment process, is important to ensuring mission alignment among key players. 
  • Impact investing does not have to be “finance-first” or “impact-first”, but can be “professional-first”. Asset managers can apply the same degree of professionalism to investment decision-making as to traditional investing, and so comply with the fiduciary responsibility of institutional investors. Investors can use a methodical approach to building an impact investment portfolio based on the risk, return and impact profile of individual investments and the portfolio as a whole.

“Innovations for Unlocking Mainstream Capital” looks at innovative impact investing solutions that can meet the needs of multiple stakeholders, including commercial investors, philanthropic organizations, governments and retail investors. The section’s key messages include the following:

  • Commingling funds serve as innovative forms of partnership among previously isolated capital providers. Set up correctly, they can multiply the impact of capital while preserving their contributors’ interests.
  • The Social Stock Exchange is a mechanism for opening up impact investing to retail investors, as well as making it more attractive to mainstream investment. A conducive environment for issuers and investors, along with an ecosystem within which they can interact, are important requirements for creating a vibrant public impact investing market.
  • Social impact bonds (SIBs) are a novel way of finding economic solutions to social problems and, as such, have tremendous potential for channelling resources to programmes that work. Development of a mature, well-organized SIB market based on solid infrastructure is still very much a work in progress; a robust pipeline of SIB-ready projects, an ecosystem and a blended-value investor pool are and will be key factors for success

Definitional Alignment 

Realizing that a definitional discussion of impact investing can lead to more questions than answers, this section is devoted to clarifying common areas of confusion. 

Impact investing as an investment approach that intentionally seeks to create both financial return and positive social or environmental impact that is actively measured. 

First, it is an investment approach and not an asset class.Impact investing is an investment approach across asset classes, or a lens through which investment decisions are made, and not a stand-alone asset class. Certain impact investments (e.g. public equity security of an impact enterprise) may behave similarly to certain asset classes (e.g. public equities), while other impact investments (e.g. social impact bond) may not behave similarly to other asset classes (e.g. corporate bond). 

Second, intentionality matters. Investments that are motivated by the intention to create a social or environmental good are impact investments. However, if the intention is solely financial gain, even if the investment unintentionally creates social or environmental value, the designation of the investment being an impact investment is less certain. For example, an investment made into a pharmaceutical company that manufactures life-saving medications solely for the purpose of generating financial returns without the intention for social impact is not an impact investment. That said, the investment may certainly be impactful, but not an “impact investment” by definition.

Third, the outcomes of impact investing, including both the financial return and the social and environmental impact, are actively measured. The degree of financial return may vary widely from recovery of principal to above-market rates of return. In addition to financial return, the investment’s social or environmental value must be measured in order for the investment to be considered an impact investment. 

Back to Top
Subscribe for updates
A weekly update of what’s on the Global Agenda
Follow Us
About
Our Mission
Leadership and Governance
Our Members and Partners
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Communities
History
Klaus Schwab
Our Impact
Media
Pictures
A Global Platform for Geostrategic Collaboration
Careers
Open Forum
Contact Us
Mapping Global Transformations
Code of Conduct
World Economic Forum LLC
Sustainability
World Economic Forum Privacy Policy
Media
News
Accreditation
Subscribe to our news
Members & Partners
Member login to TopLink
Strategic Partners' area
Partner Institutes' area
Global sites
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Open Forum
Global Shapers
Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship
EN ES FR 日本語 中文
© 2022 World Economic Forum
Privacy Policy & Terms of Service