• Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership and Governance
    • Our Members and Partners
    • Communities
    • History
    • Klaus Schwab
    • Media
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • World Economic Forum USA
    • Privacy and Terms of Use
  • EN ES FR 日本語 中文
  • Login to TopLink

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Notice.

I accept
    Hamburger
  • World Economic Forum Logo
  • Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
  • TopLink
  • Search Cancel

Report Home

  • Report Highlights
  • Competitiveness Rankings
  • Interactive Heatmap
  • Competitiveness Dataset (XLS)
  • Blogs and Opinions
  • Top 10 Infographics
  • Videos
  • Press Releases
  • [ — Divider — ]
  • Preface
  • Chapter 1.1 Reaching Beyond the New Normal: Findings from the Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
    • The Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
    • Results overview
    • Country highlights
    • Conclusions
    • References
    • Box 1: The Inclusive Growth and Development Report
    • Box 2: The Case for Trade and Competitiveness
    • Box 3: The most problematic factors for doing business: Impacts of the global crisis
    • Box 4: China’s new normal
    • Appendix: Methodology and Computation of the Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
  • Chapter 1.2 Drivers of Long-Run Prosperity: Laying the Foundations for an Updated Global Competitiveness Index
    • Introduction
    • What competitiveness is and why it matters
    • Institutions
    • Infrastructure and connectivity
    • Macroeconomic environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Product and service market efficiency
    • Labor market efficiency
    • Financial market efficiency
    • Technological adoption
    • Market size
    • Ideas ecosystem
    • Ideas implementation
    • Conclusions
    • Bibliography
    • Appendix A: Measurement of Key Concepts and Preliminary Index Structure
    • Appendix B: Acknowledgments
  • Chapter 1.3 The Executive Opinion Survey: The Voice of the Business Community
    • Introduction
    • The Survey in numbers
    • Survey structure, administration, and methodology
    • Data treatment and score computation
    • Conclusions
    • Box 1: Example of a typical Survey question
    • Box 2: Insights from the Executive Opinion Survey 2015
    • Box 3: Score calculation
  • Competitiveness Practices
  • FAQs
  • Partner Institutes
  • Downloads
  • Competitiveness Library
  • About the Authors
  • Contact Us
Global Competitiveness Report 2015 Home
  • Report Home
  • Report Highlights
  • Competitiveness Rankings
  • Interactive Heatmap
  • Competitiveness Dataset (XLS)
  • Blogs and Opinions
  • Top 10 Infographics
  • Videos
  • Press Releases
  • [ — Divider — ]
  • Preface
  • Chapter 1.1 Reaching Beyond the New Normal: Findings from the Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
    • The Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
    • Results overview
    • Country highlights
    • Conclusions
    • References
    • Box 1: The Inclusive Growth and Development Report
    • Box 2: The Case for Trade and Competitiveness
    • Box 3: The most problematic factors for doing business: Impacts of the global crisis
    • Box 4: China’s new normal
    • Appendix: Methodology and Computation of the Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
  • Chapter 1.2 Drivers of Long-Run Prosperity: Laying the Foundations for an Updated Global Competitiveness Index
    • Introduction
    • What competitiveness is and why it matters
    • Institutions
    • Infrastructure and connectivity
    • Macroeconomic environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Product and service market efficiency
    • Labor market efficiency
    • Financial market efficiency
    • Technological adoption
    • Market size
    • Ideas ecosystem
    • Ideas implementation
    • Conclusions
    • Bibliography
    • Appendix A: Measurement of Key Concepts and Preliminary Index Structure
    • Appendix B: Acknowledgments
  • Chapter 1.3 The Executive Opinion Survey: The Voice of the Business Community
    • Introduction
    • The Survey in numbers
    • Survey structure, administration, and methodology
    • Data treatment and score computation
    • Conclusions
    • Box 1: Example of a typical Survey question
    • Box 2: Insights from the Executive Opinion Survey 2015
    • Box 3: Score calculation
  • Competitiveness Practices
  • FAQs
  • Partner Institutes
  • Downloads
  • Competitiveness Library
  • About the Authors
  • Contact Us

Ideas ecosystem

Share

The way economists and practitioners think about innovation has evolved considerably in the past decade. From coming up with new ideas, innovation is now seen as an “ecosystem” conducive to the generation of ideas and the “implementation” of these ideas in the form of new products, services, and processes in the marketplace. Some elements of the ecosystem promote competitiveness in their own right (education, the availability of finance, competition, technology) while supporting the innovation ecosystem. This section focuses only on aspects specific to innovation and leaves the discussion of the other relevant but more general factors to the previous sections. Building on the current GCI, which focused primarily on technological innovation, the new framework attempts to capture this broader notion of innovation.

We define idea generation as the capacity of a country to produce new inventions—solutions to specific technological or business problems—that change consumption patterns and models, whether this takes the form of addressing new needs or new ways to perform tasks. The generation of ideas is, however, just the first step toward innovation, which also requires bringing products, processes, or business models to market or concretely implementing them in the economy, as explored below. Opportunities and incentives to create new ideas translate into more innovation and hence higher productivity.98 Although economic literature focuses more on system incentives to spur idea generation at the aggregate level, business literature suggests that, since a relevant part of innovation happens or is implemented in firms, it is important to identify the factors that generate innovative companies and/or motivate them to innovate. Therefore both streams of literature need to be considered to provide a complete picture of the innovation environment.

Some models of endogenous growth focus only on the link between productivity and formal R&D,99 highlighting the importance of legal environments (such as the patent system) and the effect on competition of the race for new ideas. In these models, factors that lead economies to employ more researchers and invest more capital resources in research will produce more new ideas, will be more competitive, and will grow faster.

However, recent studies show that non-R&D forms of innovation are also important: in types of innovations that do not require fixed costs (such as research costs) and/or that may allow for a “first mover advantage,” the inventors may be able to maintain a competitive advantage for a sufficient interval of time to have an incentive to innovate. For example, innovations in managerial and organizational techniques, personnel, accounting, work practices, finance, and branding can increase the efficiency with which a good or service is produced.100 In this case, the benefits of innovating are not associated with selling the innovation, but instead are seen in the increase of profits through efficiency gains.

Ideas are by nature “non-rival” (that is, they can be “consumed” by several users at same time). Some ideas are also non-excludable—that is, the author cannot prevent others from using them, either because they cannot be protected by patent laws or because of their nature. For example, it would be impossible to prevent people from using the Pythagorean theorem, even if it were patented. Some ideas, on the other hand, are temporarily excludable: the authors can prevent others from using them. This can happen if the idea is patented or if the idea is hard to duplicate so the author has a first mover advantage while competitors figure out how to copy it. If ideas are non-excludable, inventors will not be able to reap the benefit of their inventions. In this case, only few ideas will be generated.101

As noted above, not all ideas are generated by scientific R&D; they can also result from other activities, when certain conditions align. Therefore, providing an innovation-conducive environment can increase the likelihood that this kind of “softer” innovation takes place. The literature shows that ecosystems and networks encourage collaboration, connectivity, critical and creative thinking, diversity, and confrontation across different visions and angles;102 these systems increase the likelihood that new ideas will be generated.103

In some cases the development of creativity and collaboration skills is related to educational opportunities, as discussed in the education section. For example Dyer et al. (2011) propose that—beyond technical inventions—the ultimate drivers of innovation are related to human capital factors such as curiosity and the capacity to observe, understand, and use ideas from different fields.104

98
98 See, for example, Romer 1990.
99
99 See, for example, Romer 1990; Barro and Sala-i-Martín 2004; Howitt and Aghion 1998; Dinopoulos and Thompson 1998.
100
100 See Comin and Mulani 2006.
101
101 The literature also suggests that there are externalities in R&D production that have three consequences: (1) since inventors (monopolists) cannot do perfect price discrimination, even with patent protection uniform pricing will generate some consumer surplus; (2) the introduction of new technologies makes old technologies obsolete and therefore harms the investors in these technologies; and (3) inventors earn private returns in goods production but not in knowledge production, and therefore they are incentivized to produce inventions only if they can market them.
102
102 Ridley 2010 argues that, in a historical perspective, prosperity relates to “how human beings bring together their brains and enable their ideas to combine and recombine, to meet and, indeed, to mate.”
103
103 For example, Coto-Millán et al. 2011 show theoretically that the chance of achieving scientific discoveries increases in the presence of collaborative relationships between universities, private companies, and public administration. McGregor and Chi 2002 show that collaborative problem solving involves the active exchange and interaction of ideas between two or more people and such interactive exchanges can result in the joint production of co-constructed ideas, some of which may be novel. Huang et al. 2010 show that collaboration is important for both R&D and non-R&D innovation but each type uses different networks: R&D product innovation involves sourcing information from clients, universities, and research institutions, while non-R&D innovation uses information from suppliers and competitors. Finally, Barahona and Pentland 2006 show that diffusion of ideas depends on time, communication channels, and a social structure to support it; idea generation is therefore fostered by stronger communication channels and intensity of human connections.
104
104 Dyer et al. 2011.
Back to Top
Subscribe for updates
A weekly update of what’s on the Global Agenda
Follow Us
About
Our Mission
Leadership and Governance
Our Members and Partners
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Communities
History
Klaus Schwab
Our Impact
Media
Pictures
A Global Platform for Geostrategic Collaboration
Careers
Open Forum
Contact Us
Mapping Global Transformations
Code of Conduct
World Economic Forum LLC
Sustainability
World Economic Forum Privacy Policy
Media
News
Accreditation
Subscribe to our news
Members & Partners
Member login to TopLink
Strategic Partners' area
Partner Institutes' area
Global sites
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Open Forum
Global Shapers
Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship
EN ES FR 日本語 中文
© 2021 World Economic Forum
Privacy Policy & Terms of Service