• Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership and Governance
    • Our Members and Partners
    • Communities
    • History
    • Klaus Schwab
    • Media
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • World Economic Forum USA
    • Privacy and Terms of Use
  • EN ES FR 日本語 中文
  • Login to TopLink

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Notice.

I accept
    Hamburger
  • World Economic Forum Logo
  • Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
  • TopLink
  • Search Cancel

Report Home

  • Report Highlights
  • Competitiveness Rankings
  • Interactive Heatmap
  • Competitiveness Dataset (XLS)
  • Blogs and Opinions
  • Top 10 Infographics
  • Videos
  • Press Releases
  • [ — Divider — ]
  • Preface
  • Chapter 1.1 Reaching Beyond the New Normal: Findings from the Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
    • The Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
    • Results overview
    • Country highlights
    • Conclusions
    • References
    • Box 1: The Inclusive Growth and Development Report
    • Box 2: The Case for Trade and Competitiveness
    • Box 3: The most problematic factors for doing business: Impacts of the global crisis
    • Box 4: China’s new normal
    • Appendix: Methodology and Computation of the Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
  • Chapter 1.2 Drivers of Long-Run Prosperity: Laying the Foundations for an Updated Global Competitiveness Index
    • Introduction
    • What competitiveness is and why it matters
    • Institutions
    • Infrastructure and connectivity
    • Macroeconomic environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Product and service market efficiency
    • Labor market efficiency
    • Financial market efficiency
    • Technological adoption
    • Market size
    • Ideas ecosystem
    • Ideas implementation
    • Conclusions
    • Bibliography
    • Appendix A: Measurement of Key Concepts and Preliminary Index Structure
    • Appendix B: Acknowledgments
  • Chapter 1.3 The Executive Opinion Survey: The Voice of the Business Community
    • Introduction
    • The Survey in numbers
    • Survey structure, administration, and methodology
    • Data treatment and score computation
    • Conclusions
    • Box 1: Example of a typical Survey question
    • Box 2: Insights from the Executive Opinion Survey 2015
    • Box 3: Score calculation
  • Competitiveness Practices
  • FAQs
  • Partner Institutes
  • Downloads
  • Competitiveness Library
  • About the Authors
  • Contact Us
Global Competitiveness Report 2015 Home
  • Report Home
  • Report Highlights
  • Competitiveness Rankings
  • Interactive Heatmap
  • Competitiveness Dataset (XLS)
  • Blogs and Opinions
  • Top 10 Infographics
  • Videos
  • Press Releases
  • [ — Divider — ]
  • Preface
  • Chapter 1.1 Reaching Beyond the New Normal: Findings from the Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
    • The Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
    • Results overview
    • Country highlights
    • Conclusions
    • References
    • Box 1: The Inclusive Growth and Development Report
    • Box 2: The Case for Trade and Competitiveness
    • Box 3: The most problematic factors for doing business: Impacts of the global crisis
    • Box 4: China’s new normal
    • Appendix: Methodology and Computation of the Global Competitiveness Index 2015–2016
  • Chapter 1.2 Drivers of Long-Run Prosperity: Laying the Foundations for an Updated Global Competitiveness Index
    • Introduction
    • What competitiveness is and why it matters
    • Institutions
    • Infrastructure and connectivity
    • Macroeconomic environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Product and service market efficiency
    • Labor market efficiency
    • Financial market efficiency
    • Technological adoption
    • Market size
    • Ideas ecosystem
    • Ideas implementation
    • Conclusions
    • Bibliography
    • Appendix A: Measurement of Key Concepts and Preliminary Index Structure
    • Appendix B: Acknowledgments
  • Chapter 1.3 The Executive Opinion Survey: The Voice of the Business Community
    • Introduction
    • The Survey in numbers
    • Survey structure, administration, and methodology
    • Data treatment and score computation
    • Conclusions
    • Box 1: Example of a typical Survey question
    • Box 2: Insights from the Executive Opinion Survey 2015
    • Box 3: Score calculation
  • Competitiveness Practices
  • FAQs
  • Partner Institutes
  • Downloads
  • Competitiveness Library
  • About the Authors
  • Contact Us

Health

Share

Health will remain as important in the updated GCI as it is in the current GCI. The availability of new indicators could lead to improvements in the measurement of the health status of the population, especially with respect to non-communicable diseases.

According to the World Health Organization’s definition, health is a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.44

It is commonly understood that higher income typically leads to better health, for example by enabling a country to afford better nutrition, sanitation, and healthcare services. A substantial body of research now points to causality also flowing in the other direction: better health leads to higher income by improving productivity.45 A healthy workforce forms the backbone of economic activity.

Better health directly affects productivity in two main ways. First, healthy workers have the physical and mental energy to perform better.46 Second, they are less likely to take time off work as a result of illness (either because of their own illness or to take care of a sick family member). In that sense, productivity can be affected by the health not only of the current workforce but also that of the population as a whole.

We intend to capture the impact on productivity of two broad categories: non-communicable diseases and communicable diseases. Communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis drag down productivity because infected workers are weaker and tend to be more often absent from work than healthy workers.47 However, the global disease burden is shifting from communicable to non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancers, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes.48 These are of growing concern because they reduce the quality and quantity of the labor force and therefore negatively impact productivity.49

In addition to the two direct channels described above, there are three main indirect ways in which better health translates into greater productivity, with effects becoming apparent only in the medium to long run. First, healthy children tend to attend school more regularly, stay in school for longer, and develop higher levels of cognitive ability, thus improving the overall level of education of the future workforce. The importance of education for productivity is described further below.

Second, healthier individuals live longer, and individuals with longer life expectancies are likely to invest more in building their human capital through education because they can expect higher returns on their investment. And third, healthier individuals are likely to spend less on medical expenses, enabling them to save more. With a longer life expectancy, an individual may be motivated to save more for retirement. This will increase the amounts available to fund investments; investments that businesses are also more likely to make when they know they can rely on a healthy workforce.

44
44 This definition is based on the preamble to the World Health Organization’s Constitution. See WHO 1946.
45
45 See, for instance, Bloom and Canning 2000, 2008; Cole and Neumayer 2006; Tompa 2002; UNIDO 2007; WHO 2001.
46
46 For the arguments on how a healthy workforce impacts productivity, see, for instance: Bloom and Canning 2008; WHO 2001.
47
47 For instance, on the link between productivity and HIV, see ILO 2010 and UNAIDS 2015; for the link between productivity and tuberculosis, see Laxminarayan et al. 2007; and for the link between productivity and malaria, see World Economic Forum and Harvard School of Public Health 2006 and WHO 2001.
48
48 Murray et al. 2012.
49
49 World Economic Forum and Harvard School of Public Health 2011; WHO 2014; Engelgau et al. 2011.
Back to Top
Subscribe for updates
A weekly update of what’s on the Global Agenda
Follow Us
About
Our Mission
Leadership and Governance
Our Members and Partners
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Communities
History
Klaus Schwab
Our Impact
Media
Pictures
A Global Platform for Geostrategic Collaboration
Careers
Open Forum
Contact Us
Mapping Global Transformations
Code of Conduct
World Economic Forum LLC
Sustainability
World Economic Forum Privacy Policy
Media
News
Accreditation
Subscribe to our news
Members & Partners
Member login to TopLink
Strategic Partners' area
Partner Institutes' area
Global sites
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Open Forum
Global Shapers
Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship
EN ES FR 日本語 中文
© 2021 World Economic Forum
Privacy Policy & Terms of Service