• Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership and Governance
    • Our Members and Partners
    • Communities
    • History
    • Klaus Schwab
    • Media
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • World Economic Forum USA
    • Privacy and Terms of Use
  • EN ES FR 日本語 中文
  • Login to TopLink

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Notice.

I accept
    Hamburger
  • World Economic Forum Logo
  • Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
  • TopLink
  • Search Cancel

Report Home

<Previous Next>
  • Foreword
  • Introduction: Implementing Trade Facilitation and Understanding New Challenges
  • From Farm to Fork
    • Foreword
    • Executive Summary
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Scope and Approach
    • 3. Case Study Highlights
    • 4. Benefits of Improved Agricultural Supply Chains
    • 5. Tipping Points: Saving Food through Economic Efficiency
    • 6. Case Studies
      • Nigerian Cassava Flour: Broadening Value Chains for Traditional Crops
      • Indian Tomatoes: Adding Value and Reducing Losses through Processing
      • Kenyan Avocados: Connecting to High-value Export Markets
    • 7. Lessons for Implementation of Solutions
  • Enabling Automotive Trade
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Approach
    • 3. Key Findings
    • 4. Recommendations
    • 5. Conclusion
    • 6. Case Studies
  • Enabling Trade in the Pacific Alliance
    • Foreword
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Production Integration Perspectives
    • 3. Supply Chain Barriers to Trade in the Pacific Alliance
    • 4. The Road Ahead
    • Appendix
  • Enabling Smart Borders
    • Foreword
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Best Practices along the Path to Smarter Borders
    • 3. Conclusion
    • Appendix: Case Studies
  • Acknowledgements
  • Download as PDF
Enabling Trade – From Valuation to Action Home Previous Next
  • Report Home
  • Foreword
  • Introduction: Implementing Trade Facilitation and Understanding New Challenges
  • From Farm to Fork
    • Foreword
    • Executive Summary
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Scope and Approach
    • 3. Case Study Highlights
    • 4. Benefits of Improved Agricultural Supply Chains
    • 5. Tipping Points: Saving Food through Economic Efficiency
    • 6. Case Studies
      • Nigerian Cassava Flour: Broadening Value Chains for Traditional Crops
      • Indian Tomatoes: Adding Value and Reducing Losses through Processing
      • Kenyan Avocados: Connecting to High-value Export Markets
    • 7. Lessons for Implementation of Solutions
  • Enabling Automotive Trade
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Approach
    • 3. Key Findings
    • 4. Recommendations
    • 5. Conclusion
    • 6. Case Studies
  • Enabling Trade in the Pacific Alliance
    • Foreword
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Production Integration Perspectives
    • 3. Supply Chain Barriers to Trade in the Pacific Alliance
    • 4. The Road Ahead
    • Appendix
  • Enabling Smart Borders
    • Foreword
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Best Practices along the Path to Smarter Borders
    • 3. Conclusion
    • Appendix: Case Studies
  • Acknowledgements
  • Download as PDF

From Farm to Fork:

5. Tipping Points: Saving Food through Economic Efficiency

Share

Across many different value chains, one thing is consistent: the less that food is worth, the more susceptible it is to losses. Reducing food loss requires resources, either in the form of capital expenditures or increased operating costs. These costs must be outweighed by the expected benefits of loss reduction. Therefore, the more profitable a crop is, the more resources that are available to ensure it makes its way from farm to fork.34

Three main levers exist to improve the economic efficiency of agricultural value chains (Figure 5). Supply chain barriers influence each of these levers in different ways:

  1. Reduced price volatility: Supply fluctuates dramatically in agriculture, particularly in developing countries. In years of oversupply, prices drop. As a result, the cost of harvesting and getting food to market can exceed potential revenues. Solutions to reduce volatility include stable policy and reduced export barriers. For example, when Zambian maize experiences a “bumper harvest” of 30% above average, closed borders drive a 50% reduction in prices, whereas open borders result in only a 26% drop.35
  2. Increased prices: Aside from volatility, low average prices can also drive food losses. European importers of Kenyan avocados lack visibility on the level of quality they will receive, due to the existence of unofficial exporters. As a result, they apply a price discount to the origin in general. If an improved system of grading were introduced, price segmentation could be created.
  3. Reduced costs: The journey that Indian tomatoes take from farm to fork is extremely fragmented, involving regional and local marketplaces. The high number of touchpoints and middlemen add costs along the way, meaning that margins for each player become slim. As a result, investment has been less available for technologies such as plastic boxes, which reduce transport losses by up to 75%.36 

Figure 5: Three Levers Can Free Up Resources to Reduce Food Loss

 f5

Source: Bain & Company analysis

It is important to put food-loss-reduction efforts into the broader context of economic efficiency. As governments and companies have limited resources, investments to improve supply chains must be made in ways that will maximize the long-term positive impact on society. 

If investments do not allow companies and, subsequently, entire value chains to reach sustainable profitability, governments will expend enormous energy and resources with no momentum developed. 

One example is the low success rates of efforts to introduce grain storage technologies in sub-Saharan Africa. Implementation was often done without a clear path to financial sustainability, and the focus on enhancing storage often overlooked missing economic incentives.37 

If, on the other hand, policy-makers carefully coordinate efforts as part of a broader strategy to promote promising, high-potential industries, tipping points of profitability can be reached. When this happens, the private sector is able to reinvest retained earnings into the industry – including loss reduction efforts – and a virtuous, self-promoting cycle of development is triggered (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Virtuous Cycles Are Triggered when Profitability Is Achieved within an Enabling Environment

 f6

Source: Bain & Company analysis

A successful example is Kenyan avocados. In the early 1990s, the Kenyan government liberalized the fertilizer market, leading to a 14 percentage-point increase in fertilizer use among smallholder farmers. Resulting yield increases, combined with government investment in the Nairobi-Mombasa highway and the provision of reliable power at Mombasa ports, helped to allow global shipping companies to invest in and introduce refrigerated containers. Beginning the cold chain at the packhouse gate increased the shelf life of exported avocados, allowing access to distant, high-value markets in Europe. Exporter profits generated from higher-end market prices are now being reinvested to help smallholder farmers improve product quality, driving further price appreciation.38 

Similarly, coordinated efforts in infrastructure, financing, policy and capacity-building helped to drive agricultural transformations in countries such as Brazil39 and China40 in recent decades. 

Implementation of the solutions proposed in the following sections should thus take place as part of a broader strategy to achieve tipping points within a naturally competitive agricultural sector. The work of the Forum’s New Vision for Agriculture initiative and Grow Africa partnership provides an example of how public- and private-sector actors can work together to create and implement this type of broader agricultural transformation strategy. 

34
34 Note: Even if solutions to food loss meet a minimum rate of return, other factors can inhibit their implementation: lack of access to cash, low appetite for long-term investments, lack of coordination/aligned incentives, and lack of knowledge.
35
35 “Africa can help feed Africa,” World Bank, October 2012.
36
36 http://www.wbkllc.com/Tomato_Profile.pdf, accessed in October 2013.
37
37 “MISSING FOOD: The Case of Postharvest Grain Losses in Sub-Saharan Africa.” World Bank, April 2011.
38
38 See Annex for additional detail.
39
39 “Brazilian Agriculture: The Miracle of the Cerrado.” The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/16886442. Accessed 27 November 2013.
40
40 “China’s Quiet Agricultural Revolution: Policy and Programs of the New Millennium.” Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 52, Issue 2, 2011. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2747/1539-7216.52.2.242.
Back to Top
Subscribe for updates
A weekly update of what’s on the Global Agenda
Follow Us
About
Our Mission
Leadership and Governance
Our Members and Partners
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Communities
History
Klaus Schwab
Our Impact
Media
Pictures
A Global Platform for Geostrategic Collaboration
Careers
Open Forum
Contact Us
Mapping Global Transformations
Code of Conduct
World Economic Forum LLC
Sustainability
World Economic Forum Privacy Policy
Media
News
Accreditation
Subscribe to our news
Members & Partners
Member login to TopLink
Strategic Partners' area
Partner Institutes' area
Global sites
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Open Forum
Global Shapers
Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship
EN ES FR 日本語 中文
© 2022 World Economic Forum
Privacy Policy & Terms of Service