• Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership and Governance
    • Our Members and Partners
    • Communities
    • History
    • Klaus Schwab
    • Media
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • World Economic Forum USA
    • Privacy and Terms of Use
  • EN ES FR 日本語 中文
  • Login to TopLink

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Notice.

I accept
    Hamburger
  • World Economic Forum Logo
  • Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
  • TopLink
  • Search Cancel

Report Home

<Previous Next>
  • Introduction
  • Section 1: How to Think about Disruption
    • Steve Jurvetson, DFJ: Why Disruption Matters
    • Bill Gurley, Benchmark: The Innovator’s Dilemma in Practice
    • Andras Forgacs, Modern Meadow: The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
  • Section 2: Disruption in Process
    • James Beshara and Khaled Hussein, Tilt: Payments as Communication
    • Daphne Koller, Coursera: Education in the 21st Century
    • Jonathan Downey and Buddy Michini, Airware: Making Drones Easy
    • Ijad Madisch, ResearchGate: Reinventing the Scientific Process
    • Peter Weijmarshausen, Shapeways: The New Age of Manufacturing
    • Zac Bookman and Cameron Galbraith, OpenGov: Putting Government on a Networked Platform
    • Robbie Schingler, Planet Labs: The Space Renaissance
    • Olaf Carlson-Wee, Coinbase: The Democratization of Payments
    • The Connective Tissue of the Internet of Things: Linden Tibbets and Alexander Tibbets, IFTTT
    • Brett Worthington, Wink: From Home Automation to Smart Learning for Devices
  • Section 3: Leveraging Disruption for Society
    • Vinod Khosla, Khosla Ventures: Non-Linear Futures and Disruptive Change
    • Simon Rothman, Greylock Partners: Marketplaces and the Transformation of the Workforce
    • Brad Burnham, Union Square Ventures: Regulation in the Peer Economy
    • Lindy Fishburne, Breakout Labs: The Scientist Entrepreneur
    • Giuseppe Zocco, Index Ventures: Beyond Silicon Valley
  • Acknowledgement
Dealing with Disruption: Clearing Pathways for Entrepreneurial Innovation Home Previous Next
  • Report Home
  • Introduction
  • Section 1: How to Think about Disruption
    • Steve Jurvetson, DFJ: Why Disruption Matters
    • Bill Gurley, Benchmark: The Innovator’s Dilemma in Practice
    • Andras Forgacs, Modern Meadow: The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
  • Section 2: Disruption in Process
    • James Beshara and Khaled Hussein, Tilt: Payments as Communication
    • Daphne Koller, Coursera: Education in the 21st Century
    • Jonathan Downey and Buddy Michini, Airware: Making Drones Easy
    • Ijad Madisch, ResearchGate: Reinventing the Scientific Process
    • Peter Weijmarshausen, Shapeways: The New Age of Manufacturing
    • Zac Bookman and Cameron Galbraith, OpenGov: Putting Government on a Networked Platform
    • Robbie Schingler, Planet Labs: The Space Renaissance
    • Olaf Carlson-Wee, Coinbase: The Democratization of Payments
    • The Connective Tissue of the Internet of Things: Linden Tibbets and Alexander Tibbets, IFTTT
    • Brett Worthington, Wink: From Home Automation to Smart Learning for Devices
  • Section 3: Leveraging Disruption for Society
    • Vinod Khosla, Khosla Ventures: Non-Linear Futures and Disruptive Change
    • Simon Rothman, Greylock Partners: Marketplaces and the Transformation of the Workforce
    • Brad Burnham, Union Square Ventures: Regulation in the Peer Economy
    • Lindy Fishburne, Breakout Labs: The Scientist Entrepreneur
    • Giuseppe Zocco, Index Ventures: Beyond Silicon Valley
  • Acknowledgement

Section 2: Disruption in Process:

Robbie Schingler, Planet Labs: The Space Renaissance

Robbie Schingler, Planet Labs

Planet Labs builds web tools to make data accessible to everyone for solving commercial, environmental and humanitarian challenges, and has launched 71 satellites in 16 months. Other start-ups in this field include Skybox Imaging (acquired by Google) and StarVision Technologies.

Only five years ago, NASA retired the Space Shuttle programme, and the $300 billion aerospace industry lumbered along with its aversion to risk, its slow tech-development cycles and high costs. The space race has come and gone. Years have passed with little significant disruption in humanity’s most advanced sector of technology. Where once this sector captivated the public’s hearts and minds, interest has now waned. Bleak as this may seem, change is afoot and buzz is building into an undeniable space renaissance.

The resurgence in space advancement is largely driven by Silicon Valley funding and tech development cycles, which leverage efficiencies of scale and miniaturized technology to launch the aerospace sector into the 21st century. Where once a satellite, commissioned by the government and designed and built by contractors, could cost over $1 billion to complete, start-ups are building satellites at a fraction of the cost in a fraction of the time, and can iterate on satellites in real time, responding to change and new information. In the software industry, this is called “agile software”. For the space sector, we call it “agile aerospace”, and it is revolutionizing the way we explore space and understand our planet.

The rebirth of aerospace is in part a result of the first university-designed and university-built satellites. Known as Cubesats, these very small satellites aimed to teach students about the system-engineering challenges of building spacecraft and utilizing a capabilities-based approach with readily available technologies. Surprisingly, Cubesats became a standard size, and it was common to send them into space as secondary payloads on space-bound rockets, giving these new players low-cost access to space. Over the last decade, university students were trained in aerospace to build things differently with the Cubesat methodology; as a result, agile aerospace and a new mindset has been applied to traditional methods of space technology.

This new way of thinking has ushered in the space renaissance. In the same way that a seemingly impossible quest for knowledge brought human civilization out of the dark ages, a new quest for the impossible is shedding light on the aerospace industry, and there is a similar explosion of invention and creativity from new and unlikely sources.

There is no better example of new entrants and existing players adapting to the changing landscape than Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, founded by Elon Musk (also chief executive officer of Tesla Motors). Instead of governments funding and leading the process, an entrepreneur started it with $100 million of his own money. Today, Elon has created a vertically integrated company to build launch vehicles and human spacecraft, and the US government is an anchor customer. The major shift here is not just about a new entrant, but, additionally, how the government is adapting its role to be a customer and creating a favourable regulatory and investment environment that supports new entrants in space. This is how a nation state creates a 21st-century aerospace capability.

Over the last three years, we have seen exciting new entrants in the aerospace sector that are leveraging new funding and business models. These financing models include venture capital financing, crowdfunding, private equity, corporate investment and international entrepreneurial activities. With new and creative ways of raising and investing capital, companies and projects like Skybox Imaging, Nanosatisfi, Planetary Resources Arkyd-100, PlanetIQ, Facebook’s Internet.org, Rocket Lab from New Zealand and many others are entering the aerospace sector at a record pace. What was once the purview of nation states can now be incubated with a small group of people in a garage.

This access and willingness to partner is creating a new market, and all signs point to a healthy environment for disruptive innovation to occur. Undoubtedly, this growing market will eventually be met with regulation and monitoring, as the presence in space becomes more lucrative and privatized interests wrestle for an opportunity to participate. But competition is strong and the skies are clear: there is funding, there is talent and there is the will for Silicon Valley to have more moonshots and to move the bar from apps to aspiration.

This is not a new space race; there will not be only one winner. Instead, there will be dozens of new technologies, business models and new actors entering aerospace. This is the beginning of a movement where new players can innovate quickly, rethink the possible and do the unimaginable. This is a movement that re-envisions how we see our planet and home and, more importantly, the information it holds. This is a movement that begets an opportunity for humanity to look itself in the mirror and act in real time in a way that we’ve never known before. No longer will mining data for intelligence take place in the vacuum of an individual business. Instead, the collective home we call earth will be our source, and with it, the opportunity to learn and make it better.

Back to Top
Subscribe for updates
A weekly update of what’s on the Global Agenda
Follow Us
About
Our Mission
Leadership and Governance
Our Members and Partners
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Communities
History
Klaus Schwab
Our Impact
Media
Pictures
A Global Platform for Geostrategic Collaboration
Careers
Open Forum
Contact Us
Mapping Global Transformations
Code of Conduct
World Economic Forum LLC
Sustainability
World Economic Forum Privacy Policy
Media
News
Accreditation
Subscribe to our news
Members & Partners
Member login to TopLink
Strategic Partners' area
Partner Institutes' area
Global sites
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Open Forum
Global Shapers
Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship
EN ES FR 日本語 中文
© 2022 World Economic Forum
Privacy Policy & Terms of Service