• Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Leadership and Governance
    • Our Members and Partners
    • Communities
    • History
    • Klaus Schwab
    • Media
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • World Economic Forum USA
    • Privacy and Terms of Use
  • EN ES FR 日本語 中文
  • Login to TopLink

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Notice.

I accept
    Hamburger
  • World Economic Forum Logo
  • Agenda
  • Initiatives
  • Reports
  • Events
  • About
  • TopLink
  • Search Cancel

Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2018

<Previous Next>
  • Energy Transition Index Rankings
  • Country Scorecards
  • Press Release
  • Blogs and Opinions
  • Shareable Infographics
  • Foreword
  • Executive summary
  • 1. Context
  • 2. Effective Energy Transition
  • 3. Energy Transition Index (ETI)
    • General findings
    • Recent performance trajectory
    • Different transition pathways
  • 4. Country Energy Transition Roadmaps
    • Peer group comparison
    • Transition roadmaps
  • 5. Way Forward
  • Appendices
    • Complementary efforts
    • Addendum on the methodology
    • Selected country examples
    • Weights, measures and abbreviations
  • Acknowledgements
Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2018   Peer group comparison
Home Previous Next
Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2018   Peer group comparison
Home Previous Next
Fostering Effective Energy Transition 2018 Home Previous Next
  • Report Home
  • Energy Transition Index Rankings
  • Country Scorecards
  • Press Release
  • Blogs and Opinions
  • Shareable Infographics
  • Foreword
  • Executive summary
  • 1. Context
  • 2. Effective Energy Transition
  • 3. Energy Transition Index (ETI)
    • General findings
    • Recent performance trajectory
    • Different transition pathways
  • 4. Country Energy Transition Roadmaps
    • Peer group comparison
    • Transition roadmaps
  • 5. Way Forward
  • Appendices
    • Complementary efforts
    • Addendum on the methodology
    • Selected country examples
    • Weights, measures and abbreviations
  • Acknowledgements

Peer group comparison

Share

Download PDF

Download Rankings
 

Download Rankings
 

Countries approach energy transition from a variety of contexts, institutional arrangements, structural backgrounds and natural resource endowments. In that light, a “blind” comparative index analysis could yield limited benefits in terms of lessons learned or best practice identification.

It is therefore beneficial to compare countries by peer group, defined by geography, development status, other unique characteristics of countries’ energy systems or economies – depending on the objective of the comparison. This will allow countries to recognize relative strengths and improvement areas and to prioritize relevant initiatives for their country-specific roadmaps. Figure 11 shows how selected peer groups compare on their system performance and transition readiness.

Figure 11: System performance and transition readiness per selected peer groups

Source: World Economic Forum with support from McKinsey & Company

Back to Top
Subscribe for updates
A weekly update of what’s on the Global Agenda
Follow Us
About
Our Mission
Leadership and Governance
Our Members and Partners
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Communities
History
Klaus Schwab
Our Impact
Media
Pictures
A Global Platform for Geostrategic Collaboration
Careers
Open Forum
Contact Us
Mapping Global Transformations
Code of Conduct
World Economic Forum LLC
Sustainability
World Economic Forum Privacy Policy
Media
News
Accreditation
Subscribe to our news
Members & Partners
Member login to TopLink
Strategic Partners' area
Partner Institutes' area
Global sites
Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Open Forum
Global Shapers
Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship
EN ES FR 日本語 中文
© 2021 World Economic Forum
Privacy Policy & Terms of Service